A bigger slot catalogue is not always a usable one.
Sourcing research for US-facing publishers of free-to-play slot demos. We check permission to publish, availability for your audience and reliable mobile launches — before you commit engineering time.
For operators buying authorised, non-wagering demo content. Never an invitation to play for money.
What the desk covers
Three gates between a feed and a published demo.
For discovery sites, portals, editorial teams and publisher groups sourcing authorised demo content for US audiences.
Permission to publish
Whether an agreement covers your domains, method, territories and assets. Unknown stays unknown.
Check the requirementsUsable coverage
How many supplied rows survive de-duplication, relevance, documented eligibility and observed availability.
See the reductionReliable launches
Reproducible mobile checks that separate page load from game-ready, with consent and environment recorded.
Inspect a launch02 Game Information · the requirements record
Book of Dead
Separate what the agreement says from what a test observes.
Margin notes · how we read it
- Documented
Display is limited to Demo Versions. That is the only use the clause names. - Unknown
Domains sit in a schedule that was not supplied. Your domain is unknown — not allowed, not prohibited. - Unknown
"Where lawful" defers to counsel. It neither permits nor prohibits a US state. - Gate
Thirty days' notice: plan page and asset removal before relying on this title.
03 Launch Configuration
Tool, Build or Expert — who does the work?
Automate catalogue work. Keep permission decisions accountable. Select one or more routes; the matrix shows what each handles and what stays with you.
| Task |
|---|
title,studio,release_src,rights Book of Dead,Play'n GO,unchecked,unknown Gates of Olympus,Pragmatic Play,unchecked,unknown
Hard limit: cannot grant rights, certify compliance or invent measurements.
launch?game=<id>&mode=demo &lang=en&lobby=<return-url> # parameters per supplier docs
Hard limit: requires a named owner and ongoing maintenance.
Q3. Does Schedule 3 cover [██████].com and its /reviews subdirectory for demo display?
Hard limit: legal interpretation may still require US counsel.
Select a route to see who does what.
Nothing is scored. Mixed routes are normal.
Missing permission blocks publishing under every route. Software cannot create licensing rights.
04 Test Launch
The page loaded.
Did the game?
Inspect the environment, consent state and game-ready evidence. Page-load time never stands in for game-ready time, and one successful sample never establishes nationwide access.
05 Catalogue Count
Count the games you can publish — not the rows in the feed.
Preserve unknowns. Compare the coverage your publishing plan actually needs. Each square is one row or one game.
Synthetic sample feeds — fictional suppliers
Featured game records
Five titles, evidence status first.
06 Studio Selector
Compare access arrangements, not logo walls.
Direct, aggregated and metadata-only arrangements on comparable terms. Listing never establishes rights; order is alphabetical within type.
07 Client Hub · Publisher Tools
Start with one decision. Leave with a working file.
Four bounded utilities. Each shows a useful preview first; email is optional and only asked for afterwards. Everything runs in this page.
§ Research / The complete desk
Better evidence.
Better sourcing decisions.
167 research pages across 12 areas. Start with a question, compare your options, then turn the findings into a launch plan.
Start here / Permission
Before you buy the catalogue,
verify the right to publish.
Require separate evidence for publishing permission, practical availability and the legal suitability of the surrounding experience.
Read the first checks →Comparisons
Compare the rights, responsibilities and true operating cost of each sourcing route.
Explore →08 / 8 pagesReadiness quiz
Find the evidence gaps that should hold your launch, even when the total looks good.
Explore →09 / 13 pagesScorecard
Compare three suppliers against the same gates and 40 evidence checks.
Explore →§ About the desk
Built around buying decisions. Read by counsel.
Demo Supply is a research desk for publishers sourcing non-wagering demo content. Suppliers cannot buy inclusion, position or wording. Research is not legal advice.
Buyer-side research
We work for the publisher choosing, not the supplier selling.
Evidence status shown
Every claim carries its status, and unknowns are never rounded up to allowed.
No paid rankings
Order is alphabetical or set by your filters. It is never sold.
US-facing publisher focus
Territories are named explicitly and amounts are in US dollars.
Stated in an agreement, schedule or primary record we hold.
Asserted by the supplier; not independently checked.
Seen in a dated test with environment recorded.
Reasoned from other evidence; labelled as such.
No evidence held. Neither allowed nor prohibited.
Fictional sample data used to demonstrate a method.
→ Hand-off
Hand over your sourcing brief.
Everything you selected on this page — route, providers, games and domains — carries into one brief with its open questions intact.